|
|
发表于 2022-4-16 04:32:20
|
显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 政委1917 于 2022-4-16 05:06 编辑
但是这么做有个严重的问题，书中也写了，长期的分散部署对于部队的训练是有负面影响的，实际上英军也是，长期的分散部署导致部队无法进行营级以上的训练，而且也不甚经济，这么干对于殖民地的低烈度作战来说其实还好，但是面对大兵团作战就会出现缺乏经验，兵员不足的问题。
英国后来的改革中将部署在自治领的部队撤回本土，要求自治领自行组织部队负责自身防务，然后事实上改掉了团体制，军制上向欧陆靠拢。但是髡贼没有这个条件，英国能让自治领和英属印度自行组织部队是因为已经统治了很久有了统治基础，但是髡贼不一样，到头来殖民地和驻外站的卫戍部队还得靠中央派遣。
In 1869, troops were withdrawn from self-governing colonies, which were encouraged to raise their own local forces. This scattering of troops over far-flung colonies was likewise a Wellingtonian policy. Its initial motives had been to avoid the traditional British suspicion of a standing army (led by the Whigs). The policy was a failure on economic practicality, and also prevented training at any level above that of battalion. By 1871, 26,000 British troops had been withdrawn from overseas territories and returned to Great Britain.
总体而言我的意见就是最好不要去北上（反正我也反对过度插手大陆事务），不北上不深入内陆就没有大兵团大纵深作战的需求，那现有的营单位体制就能满足需求。
如果一定要考虑近期进一步深入大陆的话，那恐怕伏波军就得双轨化了，也就是搞类似解放战争时期野战军和独立团并行的编制体制？髡贼的话就是作为殖民地部队的独立营、团和作为机动部队的远征军
|
|
楼主: PETNrdx
[复制链接]
